Posted on

UFO-UAP Information – How to Get Started

It’s official – UFOs are ‘real.’ ‘Real’ as in ‘can be tracked on radar and other devices’ and appear to not be made by any known ‘human beings.’ The conclusion comes from the fact that, it appears based on research, UAPs are NOT made by humans since no one can confirm humans made them and they appear to exhibit capabilities that no human civilization has been capable of.

I’m currently fascinated by UFOs given what is going on in the news lately regarding the irrefutable evidence of their existence. I have never seen a UAP, and I don’t know if that’s a good thing or a bad thing. All I can write on is what I come across from reputable online sources.

Please note that this page is a work in progress.

SUGGESTIONS ON HOW TO GET STARTED LEARNING ABOUT UAP

I would like to make suggestions for you on how to get started investigating the UAP subject. It is a huge topic and its easy to get lost and sidetracked. To get a good overview of the topic, review the first two Lue Elizondo interview videos that I’ve posted below. Make sure to review the videos in their entirety as they provide a great introduction, and try to take notes. I personally prefer the video by the New York Post, however, the video by the Washington Post is good, too. Then after you’ve gotten your grounding on the subject, its time to jump into a true case study. The Nimitz Encounter. It seems the Nimitz case is the best documented evidence that is available to the general public. I will point you to the Nimitz case later on this page. Its so well documented, that you’d struggle to dispute this event ever happened.

Thank you to all involved in the Nimitz incident for your revealing the information that you can. And thank you to Lue Elizondo and Christopher Mellon for finally bringing the concept of UFOs into the mainstream and adding much needed gravitas to the subject.

APPROACH THE UFO/UAP FROM A SOLEY SCIENTIFIC PERSPECTIVE

If you’re new to the field of ufology, as I am, there are many ways to study it. I prefer the scientific way of studying it because its easier to prove. I invite you to view ufology from a scientific perspective because it takes unproveable ‘personal tales’ and sets those aside as anecdotal evidence. Why? Because its nearly impossible to prove personal events such as UFO abductions. Personal tales are impossible to measure accurately and, consequently, leave a lot of room for error and conjecture. The scientific method concentrates on those physical aspects which can be described and measured and, therefore, recorded as strong evidence of their existence. Please note, I’m not saying that UFO abductions are false, I’m saying that given our current technology, we cannot prove they are true. I suspect the only way to prove them is for someone to wear a gopro camera for example.

BUT I’M NOT A SCIENTIST

You don’t have to be a scientist to scientifically study UFO/UAP sources of information. Basically, studying something scientifically means measuring and recording physical evidence against predefined standards that hopefully, can and should be repeatable. For example, it is one thing to say I am 5 foot 6 inches tall (which is a physical measurement based on the predefined standard of feet and inches) verses saying I’m the height of fully grown person (what does that mean? fully grown people can be very short to very tall). I hope that gives you an idea of the difference between scientific evidence and anecdotal evidence. So what are scientific measurements? Measurements include time, date, longitude, latitude, altitude, diameter, width, height, length, shape, frequency, radar, infrared, other reactions to electronics, etc. So when you do your research, make sure your sources provide you measurable evidence.

Now, I think our world has reached a sufficiently technologically advanced ability with radar, cameras, satellites, etc that we’re able to finally accurately and precisely measure UFOs/UAPs and also make sure that our equipment is operating properly. I don’t think we’ve really had that ability until recent times. Because of that, we’ve never really had genuine irrefutable ‘scientific’ evidence. At least not evidence readily available to the public for, as I understand it, UFO craft have actually crashed on earth and been retrieved by the US Government. The Government has yet to officially reveal that they do have crashed UFO remains so I will leave that subject alone for now.

Why is our current technologically advanced equipment such a game changer in regard to UFO/UAP studies? Because these advanced radars, cameras and satellites can see what we can’t see. There is more around us that we can’t see than what we can see. To illustrate, are you aware the common flea, the kind that lives on dogs, is blind? However, a flea can detect blood and the flea will jump to places where it detects blood…and yet a flea is blind and has no concept of the world that you and I are aware of that includes the colors and structures of our visible world. The flea lives in the midst of so much and has no idea! The flea only cares about finding blood and so that’s all it ‘sees.’ So this technologically advanced equipment serves to see things that we can’t and then obtain that information and serve it to us in a manner that we can visually see on a computer screen (for example). For example, we can’t see infrared wavelength although we definitely can feel it. Infrared is a great way to see objects that have(or don’t have) any kind of temperature.



Here are useful links regarding UFO/UAP Intelligence Report and Suggestions on How to Investigate Further.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena 25 June 2021

Suggestions for Congress on the UAP Issue

Ethical Skeptic’s Take on the Preliminary Assessment of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena









THE NIMITZ CASE

Begin with the 60 minutes interview to get a good overview of what happened. Then review the Kevin Day interview because this is where the STORY REALLY BEGINS and includes much detailed information regarding how the UAPs were discovered. The 60 minute interview discusses the pilots encountering the UAPs. The Kevin Day interview discusses events that occurred before the pilot encounter when the UAPs were first seen on radar and it was determined that pilots should go out to see in person what’s going on.









GREAT VIDEO ABOUT SCIENTIFIC CIVILIAN (NONGOVERNMENT) STUDY OF UAP

THE IMPLICATION OF UAP FOR HUMANS I plan on writing about UAP phenomena with relation to time. I will leave a nugget here with my conclusion that time travel to the past is physically impossible and impractical. I would also like you to see this video of Lue Elizondo expanding on a previous comment he made when asked (paraphrased) “How would the world respond if we knew everything that Lue knew about UAP?” at the 1:27:50 to 1:36:00 timestamp. Then watch the entire video AFTER you’ve seen the other videos on this page so it makes sense to you.

Posted on Leave a comment

ARE UAP/UFOs A DANGER TO PEOPLE ON EARTH?

This post is only a summary of my thoughts on this issue. It is a work in progress. I think the answer for now must be ‘yes’ they pose a danger to us. Until they willingly meet us in a friendly, open manner then we cannot assume they are friendly. We must be cautious. We should not worry or feel bad about being cautious. An advanced, but friendly, alien species would respect our need to maintain our safety as they have not offered us a proper introduction. We don’t show, generally, anger or attack a wild animal that growls at us when we are in its native territory. We keep a safe distance and cause them no harm. Maybe, we would toss some food toward the animal to show we are friendly. Then again, when we develop a tract of land for future homes, we simply rip out all of the vegetation and hope every living thing runs away. We never rehome the inhabitants or even say ‘sorry.’

The operators of the UAP share the same universe as us, and I would think share some of the basic aspects of evolution as us… for example, different species compete for resources on the planet. I’m sure the case was the same for them wherever they came from. Since they have evolved based on competition as humans did, Is it not possible that they have the same mindset we have? In other words, if we came across another group of intelligent beings would we greet them in a friendly and open manner hoping to establish a means for financial cooperation(trading goods)? I would hope so, at least Americans would. Then again, that assumption is based on the fact that I believe in capitalism and freedom. They could in fact simply want to dominate and control us more in the communistic, fascist way.

If we simply showed up at will near their military training areas, nuclear weapons and nuclear power plants without any introduction and then left at will when we felt like it, how would they perceive that? If we shut their nuclear weapons on and off, how would they perceive that? Why is there no true attempt to establish a relationship with us? Why do they simply show up at will, run around mainly our military locations, shut our nuclear weapons off and then turn them on, make us aware of their presence and then nothing more? Are they scouts? I don’t know. They don’t really hide themselves so maybe they’re not scouts. Maybe, they’re curious. Do we introduce ourselves to ants when we investigate an ant farm? No. Do we intend to hurt ants? Not really. Do we feel the need to disguise ourselves so the ants don’t see us? No. Of course, if an ant bites us, we don’t generally punish it, we ‘destroy’ it via ant spray, etc, which is a punishment which is extreme given the ‘offense.’ However, we have no way to communicate with ants and so really, the only way to stop the ant bites is ant control.

I do think however, if, as an example, we were able to go back in time 5000 years while maintaining our technological equipment, would we treat the ancient Egyptians with respect? Would we honor their laws? Or would we settle down on the Nile river and force them to make room for us? What would we do and how would we treat them? I think more than likely, we would be good to them. That depends on which of us goes into the past, I suppose. We can be inconsiderate to our fellow inhabitants of the earth, but we can be kind, too. We give shelter and food to our pets. We live peacefully alongside birds and lizards.

I think the operators of these UAP have to understand we are sentient beings and its only proper to establish genial contact with us. We are the inhabitants of this planet and it is our home. I believe if they are friendly, they would not want to cause or elicit any distress from us. For all I know, they have established formal contact with world leaders but it has been kept quiet. If that is the case, world leaders should speak up because the people of the world are concerned. Though many may not be able to articulate it, there is a great uneasiness about knowing they’re regularly visiting the above mentioned locations, especially as it appears no genuine attempt for contact has been made.

Then again, maybe we’re savage bumpkins that have no clue that interplanetary travel is common. Maybe, we’re making a big deal out of nothing in the eyes of the UAP operators. Maybe, we’re the only group that has the concept of ‘country’ and leaders. Maybe they are to us, what we are to the noncontactable tribes in south america?